From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Lee, Mija" <mija(at)scharp(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity |
Date: | 2009-09-04 16:54:39 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10909040954t1867c525s6a9fdb0f7e42b4d6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Lee, Mija<mija(at)scharp(dot)org> wrote:
> Hi -
> Thanks for the response.
> I'm on solaris so the ps ax doesn't work for me. I think the equivalent
> is ps -ef which shows:
> postgres 6939 22678 0 15:49:49 ? 1:33
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 22678 16072 0 Aug 06 ? 5:22
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 5074 22678 0 Aug 12 ? 710:08
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 8677 22678 0 Aug 13 ? 894:39
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 8347 22678 0 Aug 25 ? 357:27
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 343 22678 0 Aug 13 ? 368:30
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 8678 22678 0 Aug 13 ? 695:15
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 24793 22678 0 Aug 12 ? 2048:13
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 22690 22678 0 Aug 06 ? 106:15
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 22686 22678 0 Aug 06 ? 3:09
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 22691 22678 0 Aug 06 ? 1145:42
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 350 22678 0 Aug 13 ? 262:39
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 16593 22678 0 Aug 12 ? 731:57
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
> postgres 22688 22678 0 Aug 06 ? 104:59
> /services/8.3.5/bin/postgres -D /services/pgdata2
>
> If I'm wrong about the ps commands, please correct me.
> When I cross reference this against pg_stat_activity, 5 of them don't
> show up, and a top shows the same processes using 0% cpu but almost a
> gig of memory. Are these internal postgres processes that don't make a
> connection?
Got me, I've never been real handy on Solaris. There's likely a
command that'll show something closer to what I posted. Note that in
the list I posted there are several processes that are NOT pg
backends, but are helper processes (stats collector etc) and it's
normal to have a handful of these processes on a pg server.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-04 17:21:43 | Re: postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity |
Previous Message | Lee, Mija | 2009-09-04 16:32:59 | Re: postgres processes not reflected in pg_stat_activity |