| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rui Carvalho <rui(dot)hmcarvalho(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mike Ivanov <mikei(at)activestate(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: - Slow Query |
| Date: | 2009-07-01 17:42:35 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10907011042o7936fe16q6b04c4d7369bb472@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Rui Carvalho<rui(dot)hmcarvalho(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> hum thanks a lot for the quick answer,
>
> if is not abuse of your patience
>
> what is the best alternative to the LEFT OUTER JOINS?
Hard to say. Generally, when you really do need a left, right, or
full outer join, you need it, and there's not a lot of alternatives.
Sometimes putting a where clause portion into the on clause helps.
like:
select * from a left join b on (a.id=b.id) where a.somefield=2
might run faster with
select * from a left join b on (a.id=bid. and a.somefield=2);
but it's hard to say. I'd definitely post it to the list and see who
knows what.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-01 17:52:51 | Re: - Slow Query |
| Previous Message | Rui Carvalho | 2009-07-01 17:37:30 | Re: - Slow Query |