From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Martin Gainty <mgainty(at)hotmail(dot)com>, tlieberman(at)marchex(dot)com, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 10 TB database |
Date: | 2009-06-16 20:06:17 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10906161306o3b7a6e1cwfce810906f06b71d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2009/6/16 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2009/6/16 Martin Gainty <mgainty(at)hotmail(dot)com>:
>> would suggest Oracle 11 for DB of 10TB or greater
>> http://www.oracle.com/solutions/performance_scalability/tpc-h-10tb-11g.html
>
> You are joking, right ?
> Better invest that money in paying someone from -hackers to add
> features required, if there will be any !
> Or buy for that heftier RAID, with more disks...
You can throw a metric ton of hardware and development at a problem
for the cost of an Oracle license.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Jones | 2009-06-16 23:09:13 | Re: Dynamic table |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-06-16 19:59:37 | Re: 10 TB database |