Re: Problems with autovacuum

2009/5/25 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2009/5/25 Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>>
>> So, in 2000 databases, there's only an average of 2 relations per db
>> and 102 dead rows?  Cause that's all you got room for with those
>> settings.
>>
>> Whats the last 20 or so lines of vacuum verbose as run by a superuser say?
>
> according to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html
> max_fsm_relations applies only to tables and indices, and it says "in
> database", so I presume that means per database. In which case, those
> settings are ok.
> It would be nice, to see if vacuum actually complains about it.

The docs say: "These parameters control the size of the shared free
space map," Key word being shared.