From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Thurlow <alex(at)blastro(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tuning resource parameters for a logging database. |
Date: | 2009-05-21 19:39:19 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10905211239v22d4563el1267ae954a79ef1f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
Below, I meant with a logging / reporting database...
> With a logging database you're optimizing two often opposing actions.
> Lots of small inserts in a stream that HAVE to get processed and put
> in efficiently. This is often accomplished with minimum
> shared_buffers and work_mem, because there's no need for the overhead
> of large shared_buffers and insert queries for logging dbs don't need
> much work_mem.
>
> With a reporting database you run queries that chew up tons of memory
> both shared_buffers and work_mem for efficient operation.
>
>> work_mem = 128MB
>
> Bigger than needed for logging, good for reporting. You can probably
> just leave it.
Note that you can set work_mem per user, so have the reporting users
log in with a different user and you can crank this up a bit, say 512M
to 1G if you're only ever running 1 or 2 reports. Careful about
running the machine out of memory, work_mem is a foot gun if you set
it too high and run a lot of queries at once.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-05-21 19:42:29 | Re: Tuning resource parameters for a logging database. |
Previous Message | Alex Thurlow | 2009-05-21 19:39:05 | Re: Tuning resource parameters for a logging database. |