Re: Nooby Q: Should this take five hours? And counting?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kenneth Tilton <kentilton(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nooby Q: Should this take five hours? And counting?
Date: 2009-04-19 00:26:04
Message-ID: dcc563d10904181726y1426964bg46b4ceacc9b3a9b0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Kenneth Tilton <kentilton(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ie, 5hrs and counting, no clue how long it intends to run, but methinks this
> is insane even if it is 10^7 records, mebbe half a dozen dups per value (a
> product-id usually around 8-chars long):
>
> CREATE INDEX web_source_items_by_item_id_strip
>               ON web_source_items
>               USING btree (item_id_strip);
>
> Am I unreasonably impatient?
>
> I see pg getting just a few % CPU on a heavily ram/core-endowed Sun box with
> nothing else going on. Mebbe they installed pg on a compact flash? DVD-RW?
> /usr/local/something, prolly not.

What does vmstat 1 60 say during the index build? Specifically the
cpu columns for user, system, wa?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Tilton 2009-04-19 00:32:39 Re: Nooby Q: Should this take five hours? And counting?
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2009-04-18 22:36:54 Re: [GENERAL] Performance of full outer join in 8.3