Re: Raid 10 chunksize

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stef Telford <stef(at)ummon(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raid 10 chunksize
Date: 2009-04-01 16:41:48
Message-ID: dcc563d10904010941r283b7536g383c8daa8b933ce7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Stef Telford <stef(at)ummon(dot)com> wrote:
>     I do agree that the benefit is probably from write-caching, but I
> think that this is a 'win' as long as you have a UPS or BBU adaptor,
> and really, in a prod environment, not having a UPS is .. well. Crazy ?

You do know that UPSes can fail, right? En masse sometimes even.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Wakeling 2009-04-01 16:46:04 Re: self join revisited
Previous Message Rikard Pavelic 2009-04-01 16:30:23 self join revisited