Re: I don't want to back up index files

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: I don't want to back up index files
Date: 2009-03-11 23:38:11
Message-ID: dcc563d10903111638h139de1d7r9421d52fafaa297e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> wrote:
> Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>> So like JD said, if you don't want to dump indicies - just use pg_dump...
>
> If pg_dump were an acceptable backup tool, we wouldn't need PITR, would we?
>  We used pg_dump for years.  There's a very good reason we no longer do.
>  That suggestion is silly.

pg_dump is a perfectly acceptable backup tool, as is PITR. They have
different ways of operating based on what you need. Trying to make
PITR act more like pg_dump seems kind of silly to me.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glen Parker 2009-03-11 23:57:56 Re: I don't want to back up index files
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-03-11 23:27:36 Re: I don't want to back up index files