From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Lentes, Bernd" <bernd(dot)lentes(at)helmholtz-muenchen(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question to transaction ID wraparound |
Date: | 2009-02-27 10:03:49 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10902270203t19f5a541iac7d69a2bd87cd0c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Lentes, Bernd
<bernd(dot)lentes(at)helmholtz-muenchen(dot)de> wrote:
> Hello ML,
>
> I'm very new to Postgres.
> In the log, i got messages concerning transaction ID wraparound.
> I red the documentation and made a vaccum on that database.
> In the documentation i also found the hint to look in the database with
> "SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;", which i did.
> I did the command several times in a few seconds, and this number is growing very quickly,
> although i'm not expecting transactions in the database.
Please note that nearly EVERYTHING that happens in postgres is a
transaction. if you type a single command, boom, it's a transaction.
You actually get fewer transaction events if you enclose a bunch of
stuff in begin; commit; pairs than if you run single commands.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lentes, Bernd | 2009-02-27 10:30:48 | Re: Question to transaction ID wraparound |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-02-27 10:02:23 | Re: Question to transaction ID wraparound |