Re: PGSQL or other DB?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Jones <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com>
Cc: durumdara <durumdara(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGSQL or other DB?
Date: 2009-01-31 17:36:08
Message-ID: dcc563d10901310936u78b44705xb076b375eb27e0a0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Erik Jones <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:37 AM, durumdara wrote:

>> - I can add/modify a table, or a field to a table without "full lock" on
>> the table (like DBISAM restructure). Like in FireBird, where the "add field"
>> change only the table description. I don't know that PG supports this way of
>> the DB modifying.
>
> Nope. PostgreSQL is an all or nothing transactional database. I'd never
> heard of DBISAM before you mentioned it and have never used Firebird. After
> doing a little reading it turns out that if you plan to use transactions at
> all (which is very likely given even just the little you've described about
> the applications you're building) then you should realize that altering
> tables is not compatible with transactions and doing so will automatically
> commit any open transactions on the table.

Are talking about pgsql or some other database? Everything in pgsql
can be done in a transaction, except create / drop database /
tablespace.

> Looking into Firebird I couldn't
> find how it handles (or doesn't) that at all I but I did see that it will
> happily let you add a new not null column with no default to a table by
> writing nulls for the new attribute for any existing columns. That already
> makes me queasy.

That's pretty much what pgsql does. Why does it make you queasy?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rhubbell 2009-01-31 18:10:01 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Octavio Alvarez 2009-01-31 17:34:41 Re: Pet Peeves?