From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Erik Jones <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com> |
Cc: | durumdara <durumdara(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PGSQL or other DB? |
Date: | 2009-01-31 17:36:08 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10901310936u78b44705xb076b375eb27e0a0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Erik Jones <ejones(at)engineyard(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:37 AM, durumdara wrote:
>> - I can add/modify a table, or a field to a table without "full lock" on
>> the table (like DBISAM restructure). Like in FireBird, where the "add field"
>> change only the table description. I don't know that PG supports this way of
>> the DB modifying.
>
> Nope. PostgreSQL is an all or nothing transactional database. I'd never
> heard of DBISAM before you mentioned it and have never used Firebird. After
> doing a little reading it turns out that if you plan to use transactions at
> all (which is very likely given even just the little you've described about
> the applications you're building) then you should realize that altering
> tables is not compatible with transactions and doing so will automatically
> commit any open transactions on the table.
Are talking about pgsql or some other database? Everything in pgsql
can be done in a transaction, except create / drop database /
tablespace.
> Looking into Firebird I couldn't
> find how it handles (or doesn't) that at all I but I did see that it will
> happily let you add a new not null column with no default to a table by
> writing nulls for the new attribute for any existing columns. That already
> makes me queasy.
That's pretty much what pgsql does. Why does it make you queasy?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | rhubbell | 2009-01-31 18:10:01 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Previous Message | Octavio Alvarez | 2009-01-31 17:34:41 | Re: Pet Peeves? |