From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jason Long" <mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Date: | 2008-12-01 23:39:38 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10812011539w4bc71575ma927f53eb5b7d76d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jason Long
<mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com> wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>
> I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for
> reference in case it gets forcibly removed...
>
> Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a
> 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed
> that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me?
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
> I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have
> transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was looking
> for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.
>
> I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.
>
> "Sun Picks Up MySQL For $1 Billion" to bad for them they did not go with
> PostgreSQL. :)
It's free. The pgsql community, however, is priceless.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Long | 2008-12-01 23:45:15 | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Previous Message | Jason Long | 2008-12-01 23:10:18 | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |