Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jason Long" <mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Date: 2008-12-01 23:39:38
Message-ID: dcc563d10812011539w4bc71575ma927f53eb5b7d76d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Jason Long
<mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com> wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>
> I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for
> reference in case it gets forcibly removed...
>
> Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a
> 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed
> that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me?
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
> I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have
> transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was looking
> for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.
>
> I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.
>
> "Sun Picks Up MySQL For $1 Billion" to bad for them they did not go with
> PostgreSQL. :)

It's free. The pgsql community, however, is priceless.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Long 2008-12-01 23:45:15 Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Previous Message Jason Long 2008-12-01 23:10:18 Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"