From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "pgSQL - General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sort_mem param of postgresql.conf |
Date: | 2008-11-13 18:15:18 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10811131015q7dab6bcmdf092f51664b8e1b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Be advised that the work_mem setting (and its deprecated alias sort_mem)
>> are on a per-client basis. So if you have a bunch of people running reports
>> with that setting, you might discover your server running out of memory;
>> that's a really high setting. Generally, if it's only a report or two that
>> need a lot more working memory for sorts, you can do this at the beginning
>> of them instead:
>>
>> set work_mem='512MB';
>
> so how do I change it back to default (without knowing what the previous val
> was). I suppose having it in a transaction won't do :P
default is 1M, but you can safely run 8 to 16 Meg with your setup.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-11-13 18:17:57 | Re: sort_mem param of postgresql.conf |
Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2008-11-13 18:13:54 | Re: simple COPY FROM issue |