From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Laszlo Nagy" <gandalf(at)shopzeus(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: rebellious postgres process |
Date: | 2008-11-04 18:03:30 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10811041003u2100bb10v11e90763f12de58f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf(at)shopzeus(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Huh, that's weird. We've fixed some bugs in the past that led the stats
>> collector to consume excessive CPU --- but that was all pre-8.3.
>>
>
> The server was rebooting intermittently, so we replaced the RAM (we got a
> kernel page fault). But it was a week ago. The server is now stable. But is
> it possible that somehow the file system became inconsistent, and that is
> causing an infinite loop in the stats collector? Just guessing.
Yes, you really can't trust any data that was written to the drives
while the bad memory was in place.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-04 18:46:00 | Re: rebellious postgres process |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-11-04 16:11:01 | Re: epqa; postgres performance optimizer support tool; opensource. |