Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Sam Mason" <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?
Date: 2008-11-03 02:40:01
Message-ID: dcc563d10811021840w1d9f7ab0gc7ed3a18a20e0bf6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:01:31AM +0900, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> So - it's potentially even worth compressing the wire protocol for use
>> on a 100 megabit LAN if a lightweight scheme like LZO can be used.
>
> The problem is that then you're then dedicating most of a processor to
> doing the compression, one that would otherwise be engaged in doing
> useful work for other clients.

Considering the low cost of gigabit networks nowadays (even my old T42
thinkpad that's 4 years old has gigabit in it) it would be cheaper to
buy gig nics and cheap switches than to worry about the network
component most the time. On Wans it's another story of course.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Gainty 2008-11-03 02:40:45 Re: Performance of views
Previous Message Nikolas Everett 2008-11-03 02:32:42 Re: Performance of views