Re: How to get schema name which violates fk constraint

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane escribió:
>>> In the second place, the reason most of our messages don't already
>>> contain schema names is that in the past we've judged it would be
>>> mostly clutter; and given the infrequency of complaints I see no
>>> reason to change that opinion.
>
>> I tend to disagree. We can run a poll in a wider audience.
>
> We already have a large poll: divide the number of complaints on this
> topic since 7.3 came out by the number of users ...

But it could well be a chicken and egg issue. People don't use a lot
of schemas because the support for error reporting and other stuff is
not finished, so they can't complain about a feature they don't use.
Just a thought. I like schemas, but they do feel like some parts
aren't quite done.