Re: Question about NOT NULL and default values.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Stephan Szabo
<sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Stephan Szabo
>> <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Tim Uckun wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is there a way to change this behavior so that an attempt to set the
>> >> column to NULL will result in the default value being put in the
>> >> field?
>> >
>> > I don't think so specifically with default, but you could use a before
>> > trigger instead that would put in a value in the new row if NULL was
>> > given.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that will fail as the primary key or not null
>> constraint comes first.
>
> Well, since he said that he'd removed the not null constraint in his
> testing, I figured that was a viable option.

Yeah, then it might. But I get the feeling the OP just wasn't
assigning a sequence as a defult.