Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bart Grantham" <bg(at)logicworks(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences
Date: 2008-10-10 13:50:23
Message-ID: dcc563d10810100650j2d2d8fcsfac67ae0e808d0f8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Bart Grantham <bg(at)logicworks(dot)net> wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been beaten into the ground, but my team and I
> couldn't find much conclusive study or posts on this issue. To make a long
> story short: we're experiencing Xeons as 50% slower than Opterons, even when
> the Xeon has twice as much cache and a slight clock speed advantage.

I'm not sure what causes this issue either, although I suspect it's
the inter-CPU / CPU to memory communication speeds that make the
difference. It seems that as the number of CPUs increase, the opteron
lead increases over the xeon.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-10 14:04:17 Re: Question about hstore
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-10-10 13:48:30 Re: GROUP BY does not follow SQL standard