| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RAID arrays and performance |
| Date: | 2008-09-18 19:33:55 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10809181233r4898b5abgf96b6be54a3f76b0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> If you have some specific bitmap index scan test case suggestions you can
> pass along (either publicly or in private to me, I can probably help
> anonymize them), that's one of the things that has been holding this up.
> Alternately, if you'd like to join in on testing this all out more help
> would certainly be welcome.
I posted in pgsql-perform about a problem that's using bitmap heap
scans that's really slow compared to just using nested-loops. Don't
know if that is relevant or not.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rainer Mager | 2008-09-19 00:34:32 | why does this use the wrong index? |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-09-18 19:30:00 | Re: RAID arrays and performance |