From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "M C" <shimeee(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Recommended number of connections |
Date: | 2008-09-17 17:39:37 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10809171039l5d5b9ca4l975462426b8c616e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:01 AM, M C <shimeee(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> What are the "maximum" amount of "connections" allowed to "postgres"? and
> what would be a resonable amount of connection/processes to see based on
> user connections?
That really depends on what you're doing with it. If each connection
is doing a simple transaction on a small indexed set, then you can
probably have hundreds of connections open on an even modest machine.
OTOH, if you're running reports across hundreds of megs with a large
work_mem setting then you might be best with only a few dozen or so
connections.
So, what are ya doing and how many users are you supporting at once?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2008-09-17 18:31:55 | Re: Heavy postgres process |
Previous Message | Tomeh, Husam | 2008-09-17 17:30:53 | Re: Recommended number of connections |