Re: Default procedural language

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Chris Velevitch" <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Default procedural language
Date: 2008-09-16 03:59:30
Message-ID: dcc563d10809152059r43017abfoc095cf0b46a0d2b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Chris Velevitch
<chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> When I do a createlang -l, it shows nothing. Does this mean there is
> absolutely no procedural language enabled or is there a default
> procedural language? If it's the latter, what language is that?

The only default language is plsql. which isn't really a language so
much as a way to clump together sql.

the most common pl is plpgsql.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-09-16 05:45:51 Re: HOWTO: select * from array_type
Previous Message Chris Velevitch 2008-09-16 03:52:41 Default procedural language