From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 100% CPU pg processes that don't die. |
Date: | 2008-08-09 20:06:44 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10808091306h4a4d132bg889409e0f181ae4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Scott Marlowe (scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> I take that back. This problem followed the RAID card from one
>> machine to another.
>
> That's certainly curious. The kernel backtrace didn't seem to have
> anything terribly interesting in it (at least to me). Sure there aren't
> more detailed logs? With an actual "Kernel BUG" or 'OOPS' line? What
> does dmesg look like? Maybe try posting to lkml?
That's what I'm thinking, but that machien just hung hard and isn't
coming back up and I don't feel like driving to the hosting center for
a broken machine. We've got a replacement card on the way already,
and the problem is NOT happening with the other card (so far, a week
of testing).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-09 20:51:39 | Re: 100% CPU pg processes that don't die. |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2008-08-09 19:47:06 | Re: 100% CPU pg processes that don't die. |