From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jason Long" <mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: full vacuum really slows down query |
Date: | 2008-06-04 23:53:38 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10806041653s218d0fdehed8af250e712c53b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Just post the explain analyze output here on the list. There's lots
of folks here who can read it.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Jason Long
<mailing(dot)list(at)supernovasoftware(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes.
> This is what I do.
> 1. Vacuum full
> 2. Reindex force
> This is done ever night
>
> My users complained about a report being slow.
>
> I grabbed a dump and restored it to my development machine.
>
> The query worked just fine, but not on the production server.
>
> I did a vacuum full and then reran the query. Now it performs just as slow
> as on the production machine. That is the only change I made.
>
> I am in the process of trying to figure out the EXPLAIN ANALYZE for both
> queries, but I have never had to read this output and I am unfamiliar with
> how to find the problem. I will post both here and maybe someone can help
> me out.
>
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 17:02 -0500, Jason Long wrote:
>
>
> I have a query that takes 2 sec if I run it from a freshly restored
> dump. If I run a full vacuum on the database it then takes 30 seconds.
>
>
> If you run it a second time after the vacuum full?
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-06-05 00:00:44 | Re: Insert into master table ->" 0 rows affected" -> Hibernate problems |
Previous Message | Jason Long | 2008-06-04 23:49:04 | Re: full vacuum really slows down query |