| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Sim Zacks" <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown |
| Date: | 2008-01-10 18:43:24 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10801101043t12df0f7cjee0e987f99fbc9e1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 10, 2008 10:50 AM, Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> wrote:
> I meant I did Vacuum Analyze.
> In any case, Aside from the vacuum analyze, I also tested it right after a database restore, so there should be no need for any maintenance features.
FYI, a restore does NOT restore the stats, nor does it automatically
update them. You have to run an analyze after a restore to get the
stats updated.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2008-01-10 18:47:54 | Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility |
| Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2008-01-10 18:33:49 | Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-01-10 19:08:57 | Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown |
| Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2008-01-10 18:33:49 | Re: 8.2.4 serious slowdown |