From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | kelvan <kicmcewen(at)windowslive(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: database tuning |
Date: | 2007-12-11 22:29:59 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10712111429i3100d4d3iba2fb76f005e528a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/storage.html
On Dec 11, 2007 5:18 PM, kelvan <kicmcewen(at)windowslive(dot)com> wrote:
> you know what you lot have left my original question this server is a
> temporary piece of shit
>
> my original question is what are the overheads for postgres but obviously no
> one knows or no one knows where a webpage containing this information is -_-
So, have you looked in the docs?
I go here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/index.html
see this down the page a bit:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/storage.html
which takes me here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/storage-page-layout.html
And it seems to have that information in it.
Again. You can look at the source, or find out experimentally by
building tables and checking their size. Some of this is an inexact
science because different architechtures have different alignment
requirements.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Jones | 2007-12-11 22:34:01 | Re: database tuning |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-12-11 22:27:48 | Re: database tuning |