Re: Is this good spec for a PostgreSQL server?

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ron Johnson" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: "ML PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this good spec for a PostgreSQL server?
Date: 2007-09-19 14:55:12
Message-ID: dcc563d10709190755y344391f6v9e31baa9ca65aa01@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/19/07, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
> On 09/19/07 08:32, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:59:36 -0500
> >>
> >> Am I so old that (even accepting Tomcat and Java) that seems
> >> "excessive"?
> >
> > Yes, I think that it's a bit excessive but the company can afford it so why not... :)
>
> Lucky SOB.
>
> I can't get my company to spring for a dual-core 2GB system with
> SATA drives.

Hehe. I wanted a new reporting server so I wound up donating a 4 port
SATA card for expanding an old workstation. Now I just need to stuff
two more drives into it, bringing it up to a 6 drive sw RAID 10.
Built it in a day. Meanwhile, the project to build a RAC cluster has
been ongoing for about 2 months. But it's close! :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-09-19 15:06:36 Re: Q:Aggregrating Weekly Production Data. How do you do it?
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2007-09-19 14:47:05 Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER