Re: replacing Access/ Approach etc

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Zenaan Harkness" <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replacing Access/ Approach etc
Date: 2007-09-08 20:21:09
Message-ID: dcc563d10709081321n19cdfcd3i23eb15ede793614@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/8/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 9/8/07, Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net> wrote:
> >> In the meantimem, is there any option to allow pg to run in a privileged
> >> account on windows?
>
> > Your friend has the following choices in the matter. He can stop
> > running as an administrator and then run postgresql from his account,
> > or he can install postgresql as a service, which really isn't a huge
> > inconvience / use of resources or he can hack the windows code to let
> > pgsql run in an unsupported and unsafe manner.
>
> I thought there was code in there since 8.2 to drop the admin privileges
> at startup ... doesn't that solve the problem the way he wants?

I think that code just lets you start it as an admin and then run it
under an unadmin account.

Hmmm. that still might work for OP.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-09-08 20:25:16 Re: an other provokative question??
Previous Message Rodrigo De León 2007-09-08 19:38:13 Re: an other provokative question??