From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Zenaan Harkness" <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: replacing Access/ Approach etc |
Date: | 2007-09-08 20:21:09 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10709081321n19cdfcd3i23eb15ede793614@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 9/8/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 9/8/07, Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net> wrote:
> >> In the meantimem, is there any option to allow pg to run in a privileged
> >> account on windows?
>
> > Your friend has the following choices in the matter. He can stop
> > running as an administrator and then run postgresql from his account,
> > or he can install postgresql as a service, which really isn't a huge
> > inconvience / use of resources or he can hack the windows code to let
> > pgsql run in an unsupported and unsafe manner.
>
> I thought there was code in there since 8.2 to drop the admin privileges
> at startup ... doesn't that solve the problem the way he wants?
I think that code just lets you start it as an admin and then run it
under an unadmin account.
Hmmm. that still might work for OP.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-09-08 20:25:16 | Re: an other provokative question?? |
Previous Message | Rodrigo De León | 2007-09-08 19:38:13 | Re: an other provokative question?? |