Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Stephen Ince" <since(at)opendemand(dot)com>
Cc: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
Date: 2007-08-27 17:14:23
Message-ID: dcc563d10708271014h73510f1qecc0d73bf2c8db6d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 8/27/07, Stephen Ince <since(at)opendemand(dot)com> wrote:
> I recently ported a schema from postgres to firebird and found name size
> limitations. Firebird has a limitation on the size of it's column names,
> table names, constraint names and index names. I think the size limitation
> on firebird is 31 characters. Postgres doesn't have this limitation.

Note that postgresql does have a limit. It's just not as short as the
one in firebird.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-08-27 17:15:05 Re: Out of Memory - 8.2.4
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-08-27 17:04:39 Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished