Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
Date: 2007-08-23 18:04:01
Message-ID: dcc563d10708231104u5a0b7cdfp5ae6bf2844eb682c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 8/23/07, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> wrote:
> Check it out here:
>
> http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com/pg_vs_fb
> If there is any interest I could also add MySQL 5.0 to the mix as the
> third column.

If you do, you should really do it as MySQL-isam and MySQL-innodb.

the limitations of each table handler are often as much different as
to make it another database server. i.e. no full text search on
innodb tables, no foreign keys on isam tables, etc...

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Max Zorloff 2007-08-23 18:06:28 Apache + PHP + Postgres Interaction
Previous Message Josh Trutwin 2007-08-23 17:53:58 Re: Apache + PHP + Postgres Interaction