| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Stephen Davies" <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Optimising "in" queries |
| Date: | 2007-08-22 04:20:25 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10708212120y3d6ee14elbd60dcf92f161730@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 8/21/07, Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> I have a PostgreSQL 8.2.4 table with some seven million rows.
>
> The psql query:
>
> select count(rdate),rdate from reading where sensor_id in
> (1137,1138,1139) group by rdate order by rdate desc limit 1;
>
> takes a few seconds but:
>
> select count(rdate),rdate from reading where sensor_id in
> (1137,1138,1139,1140) group by rdate order by rdate desc limit 1;
>
> (anything with four or more values in the "in" list) takes several
> minutes.
Can we see explain analyze output? (i.e. not just plain explain)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2007-08-22 04:24:25 | Re: Poor Performance after Upgrade |
| Previous Message | Stephen Davies | 2007-08-22 02:40:36 | Optimising "in" queries |