From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Stephen Davies" <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimising "in" queries |
Date: | 2007-08-22 04:20:25 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10708212120y3d6ee14elbd60dcf92f161730@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 8/21/07, Stephen Davies <scldad(at)sdc(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> I have a PostgreSQL 8.2.4 table with some seven million rows.
>
> The psql query:
>
> select count(rdate),rdate from reading where sensor_id in
> (1137,1138,1139) group by rdate order by rdate desc limit 1;
>
> takes a few seconds but:
>
> select count(rdate),rdate from reading where sensor_id in
> (1137,1138,1139,1140) group by rdate order by rdate desc limit 1;
>
> (anything with four or more values in the "in" list) takes several
> minutes.
Can we see explain analyze output? (i.e. not just plain explain)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2007-08-22 04:24:25 | Re: Poor Performance after Upgrade |
Previous Message | Stephen Davies | 2007-08-22 02:40:36 | Optimising "in" queries |