| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michelle Konzack" <linux4michelle(at)freenet(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SELECT question |
| Date: | 2007-08-21 15:37:25 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10708210837h533528c7t7e371808dac5b06d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/18/07, Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle(at)freenet(dot)de> wrote:
> Am 2007-08-17 12:53:41, schrieb Michael Glaesemann:
> > (Is is just me or have there been a lot of queries that can be solved
> > using DISTINCT ON recently?)
>
> I do not know... Since when does "DISTINCT ON" exist?
I have been lurking on this thread, don't have much to add, but
distinct on has been around in postgresql for as long as I can
remember. It's not SQL spec, so it's not portable. but it is
awefully useful.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-08-21 15:37:26 | Re: SELECT question |
| Previous Message | Ted Byers | 2007-08-21 15:13:27 | Re: Audit-trail engine inner-workings |