From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | postgres(at)vsservices(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Using DBD::Pg CVS with 7.4Devel |
Date: | 2003-07-13 12:57:13 |
Message-ID: | dc6c4ce7b66c3aa5704e01670cc7aa0e@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> 1. It looks like array is now a reserved keyword. Neither
> of the developers docs show it reserved. Should they be updated
> to reflect this, or is there another problem?
Which docs are you referring to exactly?
> 2. It also looks like pg_index no longer has a field name
> called indproc. Nor can I find any info on functional indexes in
> the developer docs.
Good catch. Functional indexes are now indicated by having an entry in
the indexprs column. I changed Pg.pm to handle this.
> After I modified 01setup.t/17arrays.t to change array to testarray
Good idea, I have applied those changes.
> Maybe time for another release (with the above changes?).
Definitely time; we've been working on getting a new version out the
door for a while now. See the dbdpg mailing list for the continuing
saga...
Thanks again for finding those problems.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200307130853
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE/EVcavJuQZxSWSsgRAnxbAJ49S34qPa2/0GfTTmUP6fPbBRPA5ACeJY7e
TRXik3XpW+E4mwDxYh2SQ+M=
=LoNE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darko Prenosil | 2003-07-13 19:06:06 | Re: libpq:Find Table Name |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2003-07-10 01:34:15 | Re: Using DBD::Pg CVS with 7.4Devel |