Re: Using DBD::Pg CVS with 7.4Devel

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: postgres(at)vsservices(dot)com
Subject: Re: Using DBD::Pg CVS with 7.4Devel
Date: 2003-07-13 12:57:13
Message-ID: dc6c4ce7b66c3aa5704e01670cc7aa0e@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> 1. It looks like array is now a reserved keyword. Neither
> of the developers docs show it reserved. Should they be updated
> to reflect this, or is there another problem?

Which docs are you referring to exactly?

> 2. It also looks like pg_index no longer has a field name
> called indproc. Nor can I find any info on functional indexes in
> the developer docs.

Good catch. Functional indexes are now indicated by having an entry in
the indexprs column. I changed Pg.pm to handle this.

> After I modified 01setup.t/17arrays.t to change array to testarray

Good idea, I have applied those changes.

> Maybe time for another release (with the above changes?).

Definitely time; we've been working on getting a new version out the
door for a while now. See the dbdpg mailing list for the continuing
saga...

Thanks again for finding those problems.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200307130853

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE/EVcavJuQZxSWSsgRAnxbAJ49S34qPa2/0GfTTmUP6fPbBRPA5ACeJY7e
TRXik3XpW+E4mwDxYh2SQ+M=
=LoNE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darko Prenosil 2003-07-13 19:06:06 Re: libpq:Find Table Name
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-07-10 01:34:15 Re: Using DBD::Pg CVS with 7.4Devel