From: | Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions |
Date: | 2023-07-31 07:49:14 |
Message-ID: | dbd9bc09299ff72b940d674d44c45a41@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-07-31 16:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 03:53:27PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> /* This should only be called for user-defined wait event. */
>> if (eventId < NUM_BUILTIN_WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION)
>> ereport(ERROR,
>> errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
>> errmsg("invalid wait event ID %u", eventId));
>>
>> I was just wondering if it should also check the eventId
>> that has been allocated though it needs to take the spinlock
>> and GetWaitEventExtensionIdentifier() doesn't take it into account.
>
> What kind of extra check do you have in mind? Once WAIT_EVENT_ID_MASK
> is applied, we already know that we don't have something larger than
> PG_UNIT16_MAX, or perhaps you want to cross-check this number with
> what nextId holds in shared memory and that we don't have a number
> between nextId and PG_UNIT16_MAX? I am not sure that we need to care
> much about that this much in this code path, and I'd rather avoid
> taking an extra time the spinlock just for a cross-check.
OK. I assumed to check that we don't have a number between nextId and
PG_UNIT16_MAX.
Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2023-07-31 07:56:15 | Re: Avoid undefined behavior with msvc compiler (src/include/port/pg_bitutils.h) |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-07-31 07:28:16 | Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions |