| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christian Kruse <christian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |
| Date: | 2014-02-04 20:03:15 |
| Message-ID: | db6be318-434e-45c3-9d90-f26f3bd9e3ce@email.android.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On February 4, 2014 8:53:36 PM CET, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>wrote:
>> I think he has applied the patch to hack around the alignment issue I
>> pushed to git for both branches. It's not nice enough to be applied
>yet,
>> but it should fix the issue.
>> I think the 201 is just a remembrance of debugging the issue.
>
>I guess that given that *both* cases tested had the patch applied,
>that makes sense. However, I would have liked to see a real master
>baseline.
Christian, could you rerun with master (the commit on which the branch is based on), the alignment patch, and then the lwlock patch? Best with max_connections 200.
That's probably more important than the write tests as a first step..
Thanks,
Andres
--
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2014-02-04 20:04:14 | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-02-04 20:02:55 | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |