From: | Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Konstantin Osipov <kostja(dot)osipov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Built-in Raft replication |
Date: | 2025-04-15 11:20:24 |
Message-ID: | db6152a1-fda8-492f-bacc-dee15bd07f63@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
15.04.2025 14:15, Aleksander Alekseev пишет:
> Hi Yura,
>
>> I've been working in a company which uses MongoDB (3.6 and up) as their
>> primary storage. And it seemed to me as "God Send". Everything just worked.
>> Replication was as reliable as one could imagine. It outlives several
>> hardware incidents without manual intervention. It allowed cluster
>> maintenance (software and hardware upgrades) without application downtime.
>> I really dream PostgreSQL will be as reliable as MongoDB without need of
>> external services.
>
> I completely understand. I had exactly the same experience with
> Stolon. Everything just worked. And the setup took like 5 minutes.
>
> It's a pity this project doesn't seem to get as much attention as
> Patroni. Probably because attention requires traveling and presenting
> the project at conferences which costs money. Or perhaps people are
> just happy with Patroni. I'm not sure in which state Stolon is today.
But the key point: if PostgreSQL will be improved a bit, there will be no
need neither in Patroni, nor in Stolon. Isn't it great?
--
regards
Yura Sokolov aka funny-falcon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Osipov | 2025-04-15 11:23:14 | Re: Built-in Raft replication |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-04-15 11:17:51 | Re: pgsql: Non text modes for pg_dumpall, correspondingly change pg_restore |