Re: How useful is the money datatype?

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How useful is the money datatype?
Date: 2009-10-03 13:10:27
Message-ID: db471ace0910030610x21b07c6cr39077bfecd90eb3e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2009/10/3 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> depending on the countries, etc - keep currencies in 10.4 , or you can
> compromise to 10.3 , otherwise you might run into problems with rounding,
> etc.

I myself don't find it useful to store currency values that include
fractions of a cent. I'm sure that there are legitimate reasons for
requiring greater precision, but none of those reasons happen to apply
to me. I dare say that they don't apply to most people who want to
store monetary values in a database.

Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2009-10-03 15:23:36 Re: Procedure for feature requests?
Previous Message Filip Rembiałkowski 2009-10-03 12:45:36 Re: How useful is the money datatype?