Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases

From: György Vilmos <vilmos(dot)gyorgy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases
Date: 2009-09-30 18:21:54
Message-ID: dac6660e0909301121v4f48a0a2tfe99d8d563c5f785@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2009/9/30 Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> > P.S. On your write-heavy tests, increasing checkpoint_segments a lot
> should
> > improve overall performance, if you re-test at some point.
>
> Just wanted to add that in order to really test a db, you need a
> benchmark that runs a lot longer than a few minutes. I routinely use
> tests that run for hours to get an idea how things like write ahead
> logging and such affect the db under heavy, long term load.
>

Agreed, but even with 5x1 minutes of test runs for each threads it took a
week to do all the tests.

I've once heard that a company have spent three man years for performance
testing one of its products...

--
http://suckit.blog.hu/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ricky Tompu Breaky 2009-09-30 18:29:27 Re: I can not drop a user/role because an object depent on it.
Previous Message György Vilmos 2009-09-30 18:16:48 Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases