Re: Clarification on CVE-2024-10979 and PostgreSQL Upgrade Necessity Without PL/Perl Usage

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Subhash Udata <subhashudata(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clarification on CVE-2024-10979 and PostgreSQL Upgrade Necessity Without PL/Perl Usage
Date: 2024-11-20 16:12:57
Message-ID: da4ff57d-bc55-4fd6-8b2e-802cbe46472b@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/20/24 00:54, Subhash Udata wrote:
> Dear PostgreSQL Community,
>
> I have a query related to the recent security vulnerability,
> *CVE-2024-10979*, concerning the PL/Perl extension.
>
> From the advisory, it appears the vulnerability impacts systems
> utilizing the PL/Perl extension. My question is:
>
> * If we do not use the PL/Perl extension in our PostgreSQL instance,
> is it still necessary to upgrade to the patched version of
> PostgreSQL? Or can we safely continue using our current version
> without concern?

Yes you should upgrade.

See the rest of the issues fixed:

https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-171-165-159-1414-1317-and-1221-released-2955/

It has further CVE's.

Though I would wait until the out-of cycle release that lands
tomorrow(2024-11-21) is out, see:

https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/out-of-cycle-release-scheduled-for-november-21-2024-2958/

As it fixes some regressions in the previous release.

>
> We would like to understand whether this vulnerability has any
> implications for environments where the PL/Perl extension is not
> installed or used.
>
> Thank you so much for your guidance on this.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Subhash Udata
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2024-11-20 16:15:01 Re: Update to postgresql 14.14
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2024-11-20 16:05:03 Re: Fwd: Error when opening pgAdmin