From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17950: Incorrect memory access in gtsvector_picksplit() |
Date: | 2023-06-17 14:00:00 |
Message-ID: | da453149-fa9e-67fc-fbce-80cca399bce5@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
29.05.2023 23:00, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 17950
I managed to reduce the reproducer to the following:
CREATE TABLE tst(t tsvector);
INSERT INTO tst SELECT array_to_string(array(SELECT 'a' || x::text FROM generate_series(1, 125) x), ' ')::tsvector FROM
generate_series(1, 3000);
INSERT INTO tst SELECT '' FROM generate_series(1, 100);
CREATE INDEX gistidx ON tst USING gist (t tsvector_ops(siglen=1));
(Sorry for the previous messy script.)
A trivial fix for the issue is attached.
BTW, when looking at the index contents (page 0) using pageinspect, I saw:
itemoffset | ctid | itemlen | dead | keys
------------+-------------+---------+------+-----------------------------------
1 | (367,65535) | 16 | f | (a)=("0 true bits, 0 false bits")
2 | (368,65535) | 16 | f | (a)=("0 true bits, 0 false bits")
The text describing keys looks confusing, just as if siglen was 0, but it's
not the case.
This is explained by the code:
int siglen = GETSIGLEN(key);
int cnttrue = (ISALLTRUE(key)) ? SIGLENBIT(siglen) : sizebitvec(GETSIGN(key), siglen);
sprintf(outbuf, SINGOUTSTR, cnttrue, (int) SIGLENBIT(siglen) - cnttrue);
When ISALLTRUE, the code tries to calculate bit count from siglen, but
siglen is 0 in this case.
So maybe fix it in passing too...
Best regards,
Alexander
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-01-fix-gtsvector_picksplit.patch | text/x-patch | 718 bytes |
v1-02-fix-gtsvectorout.patch | text/x-patch | 836 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-17 19:57:23 | Re: BUG #17978: Unexpected error: "wrong varnullingrels (b) (expected (b 5)) for Var 6/2" triggered by JOIN |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-06-16 23:22:48 | Re: BUG #17949: Adding an index introduces serialisation anomalies. |