Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

From: Martin Goodson <kaemaril(at)googlemail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
Date: 2017-05-17 20:28:27
Message-ID: da1d1913-9302-b29a-2b45-b2d7f148e3d9@googlemail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 17/05/2017 20:11, Adrian Klaver wrote:

> I thought you where working on VM you had access/rights to.

> That is not the case?

I have sudo access on the redhat box we're working on so technically I
could do this, yup. But whilst our Unix team are happy for us to do
whatever the heck we like within our own domain (so to speak - all the
databases, tools we use, etc), they prefer to retain control over 'top
level' system-admin stuff like disks, the contents of /lib, etc.

I like to keep our sysadmins happy, so I'm going to leave /lib to them :)

> Whoever does it needs to unlink:
>
> /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2

Got it. We'll see what happens tomorrow. Thank you for all the help so
far, it's been *invaluable*. Hopefully tomorrow I'll have some good news
to report!

btw, if this is a reproducible thing is it worth raising with
enterprisedb or 2nd Quadrant? Is this a 'bug' of some kind, or just a
really weird edge case? :)

Regards,

Martin.
--
Martin Goodson

"Have you thought up some clever plan, Doctor?"
"Yes, Jamie, I believe I have."
"What're you going to do?"
"Bung a rock at it."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2017-05-17 20:35:46 Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2017-05-17 19:11:10 Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2