From: | Martin Goodson <kaemaril(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 |
Date: | 2017-05-17 20:28:27 |
Message-ID: | da1d1913-9302-b29a-2b45-b2d7f148e3d9@googlemail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 17/05/2017 20:11, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> I thought you where working on VM you had access/rights to.
> That is not the case?
I have sudo access on the redhat box we're working on so technically I
could do this, yup. But whilst our Unix team are happy for us to do
whatever the heck we like within our own domain (so to speak - all the
databases, tools we use, etc), they prefer to retain control over 'top
level' system-admin stuff like disks, the contents of /lib, etc.
I like to keep our sysadmins happy, so I'm going to leave /lib to them :)
> Whoever does it needs to unlink:
>
> /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2
Got it. We'll see what happens tomorrow. Thank you for all the help so
far, it's been *invaluable*. Hopefully tomorrow I'll have some good news
to report!
btw, if this is a reproducible thing is it worth raising with
enterprisedb or 2nd Quadrant? Is this a 'bug' of some kind, or just a
really weird edge case? :)
Regards,
Martin.
--
Martin Goodson
"Have you thought up some clever plan, Doctor?"
"Yes, Jamie, I believe I have."
"What're you going to do?"
"Bung a rock at it."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2017-05-17 20:35:46 | Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2017-05-17 19:11:10 | Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 |