From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Collation versioning |
Date: | 2020-09-10 16:53:14 |
Message-ID: | da128862-31c8-5bf0-30d0-9dac6332c3b1@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-09-08 21:33, Christoph Berg wrote:
> IOW, I think we should aim at simply tracking the version, and leave
> it to the admin (with the help of supplied SQL queries) to either
> rebuild indexes or waive them.
It's certainly safer to track dependency for all indexes and then
carefully create exceptions afterwards.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-10 16:56:55 | Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-09-10 16:40:59 | Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size |