From: | Said Assemlal <sassemlal(at)neurorx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW |
Date: | 2024-07-04 20:18:11 |
Message-ID: | d9db9bdb-593d-4cef-9274-0db640fcff42@neurorx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
+1 for this feature.
> Replacing Matviews
> ------------------
>
> With patch 0001, a matview can be replaced without having to drop it and
> its dependent objects. In our use case it is no longer necessary to
> define the actual query in a separate view. Replacing a matview works
> analogous to CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW:
>
> * the new query may change SELECT list expressions of existing columns
> * new columns can be added to the end of the SELECT list
> * existing columns cannot be renamed
> * the data type of existing columns cannot be changed
>
> In addition to that, CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW also replaces
> access method, tablespace, and storage parameters if specified. The
> clause WITH [NO] DATA works as expected: it either populates the matview
> or leaves it in an unscannable state.
>
> It is an error to specify both OR REPLACE and IF NOT EXISTS.
I noticed replacing the materialized view is blocking all reads. Is that
expected ? Even if there is a unique index ?
Best,
Sa_ïd_
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-07-04 20:20:46 | Re: Cleanup: PGProc->links doesn't need to be the first field anymore |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-07-04 19:42:49 | Re: Improving PL/Tcl's error context reports |