Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink
Date: 2025-03-17 11:59:12
Message-ID: d9a29ded-8a95-47f2-a2d6-038fecf175e0@vondra.me
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/17/25 12:36, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm still fiddling with the script, trying to increase the probability
> of the (apparent) race condition. On one machine (old Xeon) I can hit it
> very easily/reliably, while on a different machine (new Ryzen) it's very
> rare. I don't know if that's due to difference in speed of the CPU, or
> fewer cores, ... I guess it changes the timing just enough.
>
> I've also tried running the stress test on PG17, and I'm yet to see a
> single failure there. Not even on the xeon machine, that hits it
> reliably on 18. So this seems to be a PG18-only issue.
>

And of course, the moment I sent this, I got a failure on 17 too. But
it's seems much harder to hit (compared to 18).

regards

--
Tomas Vondra

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-03-17 12:18:37 Re: Snapshot related assert failure on skink
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2025-03-17 11:50:40 Re: 64 bit numbers vs format strings