| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses |
| Date: | 2018-07-01 16:31:17 |
| Message-ID: | d929cf4e-b19b-fe0d-945e-902a4eeb0a57@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/01/2018 10:27 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 01:03:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Okay, I have done so in the updated set attached. I have added some
>> documentation as well in fdwhandler.sgml about those two new things.
>> That's too late for v11 of course, so let's them sit until the time
>> comes.
> Attached are refreshed versions for this commit fest. The deal for this
> commit fest is to not consider large patches this time, so please let me
> suggest to discard 0003 even if it is very mechanical. I would like
> however to get 0001 and 0002 merged during this commit fest so as we can
> move on with this thread as those are simple changes, and finish 0003
> afterwards.
I think you're asserting far too broad a policy for the CF, and in any
case there has been no discussion of what exactly is a large patch. I
don't see any great need to defer patch 3. It is substantial although
not what I would class as large, but it also has relatively low impact,
ISTM.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-07-01 18:23:03 | Should contrib modules install .h files? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-01 15:41:07 | Re: branches_of_interest.txt |