Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date: 2020-11-19 16:15:33
Message-ID: d9167104-fd56-937e-9b3a-112ff035a09d@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/19/20 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Let's just rip it out and be done. If anyone is ever
> motivated to make it work per spec, they can resurrect
> whatever seems useful from the git history.

+1

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-11-19 16:17:16 Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-19 16:06:52 Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?