From: | "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: testing more than one configuration on a single build machine |
Date: | 2007-08-30 15:02:16 |
Message-ID: | d8a74af10708300802l2b73d80as9e7f7036e6c9532a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/30/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> This isn't really the place to ask about running buildfarm - it has its
> own mailing list to which you should have been subscribed.
I am sorry.
Do you mean this?
http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgbuildfarm-members
I could not find it mentioned in the instructions.
> A single animal really shouldn't run multiple configurations, because it
> makes their history much less valuable. If you want to run multiple
> configurations you should register multiple buildfarm members. There is
> already support for running several animals on a single host/repo and
> this will be improved in a release that I will be preparing RSN.
Then no thanks. That seems to be too much of hassle to register 2^12 = 4096
animals.It is probably not useful either to test all the permutations
of possible
configurations.
Is there a recommendation which set of configuration might be more important
in finding problems?
Gabor
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-30 15:40:34 | Re: Why is there a tsquery data type? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-08-30 14:06:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online |