From: | William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Help specifying new web server/database machine |
Date: | 2005-06-09 19:53:38 |
Message-ID: | d8a6o5$9ep$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Processor:
>
> First of all I noted that we were intending to use Opteron processors. I
> guess this isn't a straightforward choice because I believe Debian (our
> Linux of choice) doesn't have a stable AMD64 port. However some users on
> this list suggest that Opterons work very well even in a 32 bit
> environment. Some have suggested that a single dual core processor is
> the way to go. The RAM needs to fit the CPU arrangement too; William
> points out that one needs 2 DIMMS per CPU.
Your summary here just pointed out the obvious to me. Start with a 2P MB
but only populate a single DC Opteron. That'll give you 2P system with
room to expand to 4P in the future. Plus you only need to populate 1
memory bank so you can do 2x1GB.
> Disks:
>
> I'm somewhat confused here. I've followed the various notes about SATA
> vs SCSI and it seems that SCSI is the way to go. On a four-slot 1U
> server, would one do a single RAID10 over 4 disks 10000rpm U320 disks?
> I would run the database in its own partition, separate from the rest of
> the OS, possible on LVM. An LSI-Megaraid-2 appears to be the card of
> choice.
With only 4 disks, a MegaRAID U320-1 is good enough. It's quite a
premium to go to the 2x channel MegaRAID. With 4 drives, I'd still do 2
big drives mirrored for the DB partition and 2 small drives for OS+WAL.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rory Campbell-Lange | 2005-06-09 21:01:07 | Re: Help specifying new web server/database machine |
Previous Message | Tobias Brox | 2005-06-09 19:43:56 | Re: timestamp indexing |