"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes
>
> In other words, if FSM is wrong you will overwrite valid data? No
> thanks ... this is guaranteed to fail under simple concurrent usage,
> let alone any more interesting scenarios like FSM being actually out of
> date.
>
You are welcome ;-). The FSM race/corruption is a trouble. Maybe we could
put it in TODO list for better solutions since we can see the performance
benefits are there.
Regards,
Qingqing