From: | "Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet(dot)dhaliwal01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jasbinder Singh Bali" <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transactional DDL |
Date: | 2007-06-02 16:46:54 |
Message-ID: | d86a77ef0706020946l3c334982u8dd80ad00fc15ec1@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
So, while writing any technical document, would it be wrong to mention
stored procedures in postgresql?
what is the general convention?
On 6/2/07, Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 6/2/07, Jasbinder Singh Bali <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > But its said that transactions in any RDBMS follow ACID properties.
> > So if i put a create table and an Insert statement in the same begin end
> > block as one single transactioin, won't both create and insert follow
> acid
> > property, being in one single trasaction, and either both get committed
> or
> > none, talking about oracle lets say
>
> Actually, Oracle inserts implicit COMMIT after each DDL.
>
> So, if you have:
>
> BEGIN;
> INSERT INTO foo (bar) VALUES (1);
> CREATE INDEX foo_bar ON foo (bar);
> -- Here Oracle will insert implicit COMMIT, thus your foo table will
> have value 1 commited.
> -- And here Oracle will BEGIN a new trasaction.
> INSERT INTO foo (bar) VALUES (2);
> ROLLBACK;
> -- And you will rollback the insert of value 2. Value 1 remains in the
> table,
> -- because it is already committed.
>
> Regards,
> Dawid
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeremy Harris | 2007-06-02 17:08:41 | Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS |
Previous Message | Erwin Brandstetter | 2007-06-02 16:39:47 | Re: There can be only one! How to avoid the "highlander-problem". |