Re: Connection string

Its done

service iptables stop did the trick
firewall was running on my DB server
forgot to stop it

Thanks
~Harpreet

On 8/15/06, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 10:30:24AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 04:40:36PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > > Will you take care of it or should I submit a patch? I've noticed
> >
> > I you have the time to write the patch I woul dappreciate it.
>
> I'll submit a patch. However, in the case of string literals not
> working, is that a documentation bug or a code bug? Are they
> supposed to work?
>
> > > a few other discrepancies between the documentation and actual
> > > behavior, like examples with "VARCHAR val;" that the preprocessor
> > > rejects with "ERROR: pointer to varchar are not implemented."
> >
> > Do you have an example? This surely looks like a bug.
>
> See several code examples in the last half of the "Using Host
> Variables" documentation:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/ecpg-variables.html
>
> Here's a complete example with code pasted from the documentation:
>
> % cat foo.pgc
> int main(void)
> {
> EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
> int v1;
> VARCHAR v2;
> EXEC SQL END DECLARE SECTION;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> % ecpg foo.pgc
> foo.pgc:5: ERROR: pointer to varchar are not implemented
>
> Is that a documentation bug or a code bug?
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>