Re: improve performance of pg_dump with many sequences

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Nathan Bossart" <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improve performance of pg_dump with many sequences
Date: 2024-07-11 02:52:33
Message-ID: d7f5942e-00ba-4d90-9bac-f0b2b7092dc4@app.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024, at 7:05 PM, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I'm not following why that would be a better approach. strncpy() will add
> a NUL to the end of the string unless it doesn't fit in the buffer, in
> which case we'll add our own via "seqtype[sizeof(seqtype) - 1] = '\0'".
> Furthermore, the compiler can determine the position where the NUL should
> be placed, whereas placing it at the end of the copied string requires a
> runtime strlen().

Nevermind, you are copying the whole buffer (n = sizeof(seqtype)).

> Unfortunately, I think we have to keep this workaround since older minor
> releases of PostgreSQL don't have the fix.

Hmm. Right.

> What pg_dump command did you test here? Did you dump the sequence data, or
> was this --schema-only?

time pg_dump -f - -s -d postgres

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo NAGATA 2024-07-11 04:23:57 Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-07-11 02:17:17 RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication